Random Family

Random Family: Love, Drugs, Trouble and Coming of Age in the Bronx
Adrian Nicole LeBlanc
401 pages
Read in 21 days

It has been a month since my last post. I have read three books since I finished the blog but unfortunately I haven’t had time to update it because December is the busiest month of the year for me at work. Even though I have been travelling a lot, with all the time in the air and down-time in airports, it has been nice to have a book to turn to. I like the escape that a good book can provide and the most recent ones with this project have been just great.

Newsweek says that "it took LeBlanc 10 years immersed in the lives of one Bronx family to produce this gripping, cinematic account of urban poverty and its causes. It will take you two days to read it." Newsweek, bite me…two days, my arse. At least say that it is two days where you are not interrupted by kids, work, or life. Two days, sheesh. On your summary of the book, however, I can't agree with you more.

The book follows two women, Jessica and Coco, through all of the highs and lows of their lives. As stated above, LeBlanc became a part of these families for over ten years and the detail reflects this. As a reader, you are there in the moment. You cringe as she describes rodent infested apartments or as abusive threats are hurled. Jessica becomes involved with a dangerous drug dealer named Boy George. Coco is involved with Jessica's younger brother, Cesar. Cesar is more small-time than Boy George but still dangerous.

I can't say that Jessica and Coco don't try. Jessica thought that her way out was by living on the fast lane with Boy George. She did taste the "good-life" with nice cars and clothes, trips on yachts, and fancy dinners. That moment was short-lived as Boy George and Jessica are arrested and sentenced to lengthy prison terms. Jessica is very distant with her children (she has 5 with different fathers). Coco also has 5 children (again, from different fathers), but she seems to always have her heart in the right place but unfortunately constantly makes decisions that are focused on the short-term and are ill-fated. While Jessica is in prison, the story follows Coco as she tries to make a better life but lacks the skills and funds to pick her family out of the grips of poverty. As I mentioned, LeBlanc does a superb job in chronicling what Coco goes through without having to launch on a "what is wrong with this country when any population has to endure this" diatribe. Rather, her style is straight-forward: tell the facts and let the reader decide.

For me, it is the image of the kids living through all of this that stays with me several weeks after finishing the book. As a father, I think (read: hope) most parents go through this: you wonder whether you are doing a good job. And yes, it sounds clichéd to say this, but you wonder if you are a good provider, a role model to your kids. There are the frustrations, your words seem to never sink in or are just ignored. There are other times that you forget they are not adults and will make mistakes over and over again. Most of the time, though, they bring a smile to your face as they do something silly or amaze you as they learn words, the alphabet, and read. Every day, there is something new and every day you are amazed that you created them. I know the characters in Random Family must have had these thoughts at some point. They must have wondered if they were doing a good job also. However, there were times where I wondered what their definition means to them.

Coco's oldest daughter, Mercedes, is seven-years old when LeBlanc writes:

Everything Mercedes did seemed to bother Coco: Coco relied on her as a helpmate and confidante, then yelled at Mercedes for acting grown. She chided Mercedes for forgetting to charge Pearl's (Coco's baby) Pampers or for scolding Nikki (the middle child), but neither was Mercedes free to be a child. When she tried to be affectionate with her mother, even her hugs seemed to weigh to heavily around Coco's neck. "You ain't a baby, Mercedes!" she would threaten.

I can't imagine the weight of the family duties being put on a seven-year-old's shoulders. How difficult it would be to be an adult to endure this, let alone have a child take on the familial duties. The children can't live as children in this environment. Their daily life is bombarded with violence, drugs, and pests (among many other things that most of us take for granted). Sadly, as is illustrated with Jessica's oldest child, Serena, while they think they are better than their parents, they inevitably go down the same path and the cycle continues.

As an outsider, it is easy to read the book and wonder how the characters could make the same mistakes or wonder why they can't find a way to get out of their situation. I had a moment of self-reflection while reading this book. I often wondered what I would do in their shoes. Would I find a way out of that situation? The thing is, there is no way to know how you will handle yourself with the same, limited option available. I am fortunate; I came from a stable family life. I was given all the opportunities for advancement. We had food on the table, a roof over our heads, and a community that was safe. I never came close to the environment that is described in Random Family.

The term learned helplessness seems unfair to label on this random family to explain how they never seem to get out of their situation. The abyss that is poverty is a social problem that pulls the people who are trapped in it down further. They can glimpse the "better life" on the horizon and some have success through pushing themselves to better themselves through education. Sadly, a majority find it through the drug-trade in which incarceration or death are the more likely outcomes to that path. For the rest, the struggles of every day life are taxing and there is no clear path for the way out.

Up next (and I hope to write it up next week) is Botany of Desire by Michael Pollan.

Benjamin Franklin

Benjamin Franklin
Edmund S, Morgan
352 pages
Read in 35 days

This is the kind of book that should have not taken as long as it did to read. Yes, I was busier with work stuff and couldn't find the down-time to read, but it is just terrible that it would take me this long. The book is an easy read. It's not bogged down, as a lot of historical biographies are, with tedious hypothesis about the motives for different characters. At the end of the book, though, I wondered if I really understood the man and why this book is one that Newsweek thinks I need to read now.

There are a couple things that I previously did not know about Benjamin Franklin that had I been paying more attention during school, I may have remembered. First, I did not know that Franklin was in favor of British rule in the new world. If the British weren't so darn greedy, perhaps that vision would come true. It seems that Franklin was trying to patch up the "mistakes" that the British were making and fought hard to hold the empire together. You can picture Franklin shaking his head at the vast corruption and greediness within Parliament when he confides to a friend, "…when I consider the extream (sic) Corruption prevalent among all Orders of Men in this old rotten State, and the glorious publick Virtue so predominant in our rising Country, I cannot but apprehend more Mischief than Benefit from a closer Union…To unite us intimately, will only be corrupt and poison us also." This is a man who does not have too much faith in the old system. The second thing that I learned is that John Adams is a paranoid loon. Franklin says of him, "he means well for his Country, (he's) always an honest man, often a wise one, but sometimes and in some things, absolutely out of his senses."

Morgan does a decent job painting the picture of a man who is always curious…always asking questions about the world around. Perhaps that is a trait for the great thinkers of the world. He has his own ideas about how things should be, but he is willing to have them changed; to be convinced of a new way of thinking. He seemed to be always welcome in circles to discuss scientific and political thoughts, but he wasn't one to force his view in conversation. Franklin was not some gregarious fellow whom always was the center of attention. Rather, he was the one who would ask a single question to help the speaker think of a different way of seeing things. Throughout the book, Morgan recounts how much people enjoyed his company and opinions.

Perhaps that is what makes Franklin such an appealing character to me and perhaps why this is a book to read now. Is Franklin the ideal as a politician? Some would say yes. He neither grandstands nor squelches your thoughts on an issue. He is willing to make a change to his opinion without compromising his ideals. He simply takes in more information to form his opinion. On the other hand, you have to wonder with the 24-hour news cycle these days, how successful Franklin would be in today's world. I could picture people calling him a "waffler" or watch the Daily Show replaying clips of him saying something completely opposite than what he is currently saying. Politicians don't seem to have the time or are too worried about their voters to change their opinions or take too long with making a well-thought decision (look at the flack that Obama is currently under for taking too long on Afghanistan strategy). We are a society that demands answers and change over night and raise our hands in the air incredulously when it doesn't happen.

What nagged me about this book, though, is I wondered why it was on the list in the first place. Franklin is indeed an engaging character and the way he was perceived during his time is admirable, but how does that help us understand our world now? Perhaps Newsweek wanted to say, "you think the world is bad now, we could have been under British rule?" I am not sure.

In the book, Morgan summarizes Franklin's life by saying:

We can know that many of his contemporaries came to recognize, that he did as much as any man ever has to shape the world he and they lived in. We can also know what they must have known, that the world was not quite what he would have liked to make it...Franklin knew how to value himself and what he did without mistaking himself for something more than one man among many…he honor(ed) his fellow man and woman no less than himself.

I guess those are good traits in today's world, but is it realistic in our political world?

Up next, the fantastic book (already finished it), Random Family, by Adrian Nicole LeBlanc.

Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep

Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep
Phillip K. Dick
241 pages
Read in 9 days


I grew up in a house that was definitely a science-fiction house. Both of my parents loved everything sci-fi. Every Sunday night, as I would be getting ready for bed, I would hear the beginning music to Dr. Who (of course after Dave Allen and Monty Python). They would watch reruns of Star Trek even though they had seen the episodes five times before and followed every generation after. When my dad let me borrow his copy of "The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy" it was like he was giving me a family heirloom. So, I guess a little bit of that need for a glimpse into the future is always with me. The "what would the world be like..." type of conversations I had as a kid has continued now into my adulthood. I’m still waiting for my rocket-pack, dammit!

After reading Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep, I can emphatically state that I do not want the "what-if" world that Phillip Dick has envisioned. A world that in its post-apocalypse haze would rather lure people to Mars (now with your own robot!) than to live on the desolate Earth. A world where a person's status and basic self-worth is judged by whether they have a pet and if said pet is real or fake. A world, where your mood can be programmed for you by using a machine called a "mood-organ".

The novel follows the story of two main characters, Rick Deckard, an android bounty-hunter and John Isidore, a "chicken-head--a man with lower mental faculties--who works as a driver for a robot animal "hospital". Their stories are told in separate chapters until they meet later on. Androids were initially developed as companions to accompany people as they journey to Mars and then act as servants once they are there. Good marketing strategy apparently as it seems that most of the people have taken advantage of the offer, leaving a lonely, empty world. People insisted on more realistic androids and a certain version called the Nexus-6 is so darn close to human, that bounty hunters, like Rick, have to use a test called a Voigt Empathy Test to help make the determination. He has to do this test now since a group of androids have escaped Mars and are trying assimilate themselves back on earth. He is charged with “retiring” them at a price of $1000 per android. Empathy is important as this is the basic belief system of people on earth. They follow the belief system called Mercerism and “transport” themselves into Mercer’s world via empathy boxes. As John Isidore says, “An empathy box is the most personal possession you have. It is an extension of your body; it’s the way you stop being alone.”

There are a couple themes that I got from the reading of this book. One was the emptiness and loneliness that the humans on earth endure. John Isidore’s apartment building is completely empty except for him. Everyone on earth seems to be empty shells of what they used to be. As Deckard takes out the androids, you are left wondering: was it them or the humans who truly lived?

Another theme that I felt was captured in the story was the future’s dependence on technology. The mood organs and empathy machines are just a few examples on how, in Dick’s imagination, that humans need for technology to help them basic human emotions. Truly scary stuff working here.

I don't know if it was the deep-rooted love for science-fiction that made me embrace this book as much as I did, but I couldn't stop reading it. If it weren't for some work events, it would have taken me 3-4 days to read this. I could not wait until I had the time to read it again and I would cruise through the pages when I did. It is a pretty easy read. I know I am only 5 books into the “project” but this is my favorite so far.

Ok, now I am going to admit something that, after my sci-fi love-fest in the beginning, seems unforgivable…I have never seen “Blade Runner”. There, I said it. For those that do not know, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep is the basis for the movie. After reading the book, I went to Netflix and watched the original (not the Directors Cut from a few years ago). You know what? I didn’t like it. With the Phillip Marlowe-esque voice over, and the androids sticking out like sore thumbs, I just could not get into the movie…that and Sean Young, blech. Stick with the book, you will get more out of it. Although, I should say that the visuals of the future world were pretty spectacular.

So, now that I have read this book, I am definitely going to read some more of Phillip Dicks’ books when I am done with this little project. Anyone have recommendations?

Next up, a book Newsweek calls a "model biography...(he) emerges as a quintessential hero of his time, and ours." They are speaking about Edmund Morgan's Benjamin Franklin.

Winchell

Winchell: Gossip, Power and the Culture of Celebrity
Neal Gabler
553 pages
Read in 33 days


Newsweek says in the "What to Read Now and Why" article, that "before there was a Rush Limbaugh - or Us Weekly - there was Walter Winchell: gossip columnist, commentator, McCarthyite, radio celebrity, has-been."

Before reading the book, I didn't know much about Walter Winchell other than his catchphrase that began every radio broadcast: "Good evening Mr. and Mrs. America from border to border and coast to coast and all the ships at sea. Let's go to press." I was surprised at how engrossing this book was for me. Winchell came from humble beginnings to become the voice of America heard or read by 50 million Americans. In 1948, he was the top-rated radio personality (beating out Fred Allen and Jack Benny). He was, at the same time, feared and respected by his peers, politicians, and celebrities. He was also plagued with self-doubt and lack of confidence. When he sided with Senator Joseph McCarthy and Roy Cohn against communism, public opinion turned against him eventually. He was extremely stubborn and would not apologize for statements he made. Indeed. his downfall does seem to be that he would never re-evaluate his views and would rather die than to back-down.

At the end of his career, it was he who was being viciously attacked...his attackers had years of pent up rage and waited patiently for their moment. As the book says, "Winchell's life had become a parable, the lesson of which was: He who operates in the cutthroat world of celebrity where reputations are quickly made and just as quickly broken will have no peace."

He was a guarded, egotistical, and vicious (especially retaliating against people he felt wronged him). At the core, though, was a man that was not self-confident and was constantly questioning his abilities. On the surface was a man that was seemingly unafraid to face the enemies of the world, but underneath, he was always questioning whether he was good enough. My only gripe with this book, and perhaps that is telling on how Winchell protected his public image, was that there was very little to explain his behavior. There were a lot of "perhaps he did this because" in the book.

He defined gossip and to his credit, as the gossip genre became more salacious and sensational, he kept with his formula. One thing I found amusing was that the "rule" was that you never did a story on a married man having affair...oh, how times have changed.

It is hard to imagine, while reading this book, that the roots of Winchell's gossip column would grow into the invasion-of-privacy, multi-million dollar industry that it has become. From US Weekly and People Magazine to TMZ and Perez Hilton, we have become obsessed with celebrities rites. Top-tier stars are hounded constantly by paparazzi and are not given a moment alone. We see stars who melt under the scrutiny and it only feeds our obsession. I can't even imagine my life being played out on a cover of a magazine as these celebrities do every week.

What have we become as a society where we can't get enough of knowing the trivial, private items in celebrities lives. Do we want to be like them? Are we jealous and want to know they can have messed-up lives too? The sad thing is that if was popular in the 1930s, there is no hope of it going away. We have always had the appetite for it.

Winchell popularized gossip and now we are taking it to levels that I think even he would shake his head at.

Up next, a little science fiction with Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep by Phillip Dick...Loving it so far.

Persepolis

Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood
Marjane Satrapi
150 pages
Read in 1 day

Don't be too impressed by my reading this book in 1 day. If you are not aware, the book is a "graphic novel". I haven't read a lot of graphic novels...there was "Ghost World" by Daniel Clowes that I got after seeing the movie. Maybe I felt that graphic novels weren't "real" books. The thing is, after reading Persepolis, my feelings changed. This was such a wonderful, compelling story that I can't believe it being told any other way.

The story is the autobiographical tale of Marjane Satrapi, beginning from the age of 10 and ending when she is 14. The story begins as she starts school and she is forced, as part of the new Islamic government's law, to wear a veil. The book begins lightheartedly as the girls in the school struggle with wearing the veil every day. Marjane comes across a rather precocious young girl who has a vivid imagination and almost insatiable appetite (fed by her parents) for reading about the history of Iran but also the story of conflicts around the world.

The story traces the beginnings of the Islamic rule in Iran. It begins with the overthrow of the Shah (a puppet that was put into power by the CIA and British intelligence agencies) who was brutal and oppressive to the people of Iran. People, including Marjane's parents, protested on the streets calling for the overthrow of the Shah. After much bloodshed, the Shah is overthrown and the people rejoice in their freedom from the tyrannical leader.

Political prisoners are released including two that Marjane's family knows. Their tales of the abuse in prison are vivid and horrific. Later, her uncle, Anoosh, is released and reunited with the family. He is an idealistic Marxist who understands why that, while the revolution was a leftist one, Islamic rule is what the people want:

It's not important, everything will turn out fine. In a country where half the population is illiterate, you cannot unite the people around Marx. The only thing that can really unite them is nationalism or a religious ethic...But the religious leaders don't know how to govern, they will return to their Mosques. The proletariat shall rule! It's inevitable!!

The story at this point turns as it the Islamic government cracks down on these intellects and their ideals. The punishment is quick and violent. It appears, at least to me, that the overthrow of the Shah ended one extreme rule in Iran, but, it is taken over by an Islamic government that is just as brutal. Persepolis moves to the next events in history: the taking of the hostages at the US Embassy, the closing of the universities for 2 years (due to a "decadent" school system that needs to be "revised to ensure (the) children are not led astray from the true path of Islam"), and the forcing of women to wear the veil all are announced. Protests are quickly put down with growing violence.

As if things couldn't get more difficult for the people, it is at this time that Iraq attacks Iran. Saddam Hussein, realizing that the Islamic government had jailed most of the military pilots loyal to the Shah and therefore were weakened defensively, had led the attack. The story talks about the bombings and rationing that go on. However, as the war wages on, the "internal war become(s) a bigger issue...anyone showing slightest resistance to the regime were persecuted." Realizing that Tehran is no longer safe with the Iraqi bombings and also Marjane's boldness and resistance getst her in trouble. they make arrangements to send her to school in Austria. The story ends as she boards her plane for her new school and life.

Ms. Satrapi novel does a great job at conveying mood or feeling in just one frame. You see the urgency, the horror on the faces as she tells the story. Reading this story, you can't help but be sucked into the time. I can't imagine being her age and listening to bombs exploding or seeing violent demonstrations as she has.

While the book gave a good background to how the current government came into power, there are still so many questions. I assume that Guests of the Ayatollah will provide further insight to this as well.

As a new (well, 5 years now) father, I wondered as a I read this, what will the world be like when my sons are her age? What will Iran look like? There is so much conflict in the world, will there one day be peace? I did feel a chill as Marjane's father exclaimed (after the Shah was exiled to Egypt), "as long as there is oil in the Middle East, we will never have peace."

Up next (and I did finish the book, so I hope to have the post up soon) is Winchell.

Leaves of Grass

Leaves of Grass (Original 1855 Edition)
Walt Whitman
92 Pages
Read in 15 days

A child said, What is the grass? fetching it to me with full hands;
How could I answer the child?...I do not know what it is any more than he
...I guess the grass is itself a child...the produced babe of the vegetation

Walt Whitman

Over and over we flatten the clover
Shocked me too the things we used to do on grass
It would shock you too the things we used to do on grass

"Grass" Andy Partridge (XTC)

I think every picture of Walt Whitman that I have seen is one of an old man with long white beard and kind eyes...The truth is that Whitman (self) published Leaves of Grass when he was 36 years old. And I have to be honest, he was a little randy back then...don't know how he matured in his later years, but if he was a department-store Santa (as he looks like on my cover), don't think I would sit on his lap.

No, it's not that bad, but he definitely wasn't subtle (especially for 1855) with his words: "I hear the trained soprano...she convulses me like the climax of my love-grip." Hello!

In the end, Leaves of Grass, to me, is a collection of thoughts that use nature as a starting point but not only praise nature, but the human's place in it (and the beauty we bring):

I think I will do nothing for a long time but listen,
And accrue what I hear into myself...and let sounds contribute
toward me.
I hear the bravuras of birds...the bustle of growing wheat...gossip
of flames...clack of sticks cooking my meals.
I hear the sound of the human voice...a sound I love,
I hear all sounds as they are turned to their uses...sounds of the city
and sounds out of the city...sounds of the day and night

Whitman said that he intended the book to be small enough that it could be carried in a pocket so that people could read it in the open air. I have to admit I loved reading this book in the back yard with the sound of our fountain, the birds chirping, and cicadas buzzing. Even as I type this, I am aware of the night sounds outside the window.

Perhaps that is why I found the book so excellent...after reading the meditations from Whitman, I find that I become more aware of my surroundings and try to take a minute to absorb all that is around me.

I know that I will reread this book for many years to come.

"I believe a leaf of grass is no less than the journeywork of the stars..."

Up next...Persepolis.

The Bear

The Bear
William Faulkner
131 pages
Read in 10 days

Not proud of how many days it took to read this book. If I read just 13 pages a day on average, then it will take me 61 days to read The Way We Live Now. What can I say, life gets in the way sometimes.

There are just 5 chapters in the book and I think it can be broken down as follows:

1 and 3- The Hunt...respect for nature.
4 - The boy making sense of his life, his land, and his upbringing
5-The hunt again, trying to relive the same feeling, only the world has completely changed and the frontier is being taken over by industry.

I enjoyed this book tremendously and using the reference from Newsweek as a guide on how to view the book. I definitely saw the environmental themes.

The first 3 chapters detail the hunt for Old Ben, a large black Bear, who is an almost mythical creature for the locals. Many bullets and traps have been set for Old Ben , but he will not go down. I felt, through Faulkner's words, that I was indeed in the camp and out in the hunt. As I said before, the men look to the woods and Old Ben with respect. We watch the main character, a boy named Ike, as he grows up a more confident and accomplished hunter. When Old Ben is finally killed, with the aid of a wild dog that was trained by Sam Fathers (Ike's mentor), we get the feeling that life will never be the same.

In chapter 4, the writing is noticeably different. Ike is now 21 and the chapter starts with four paragraphs that have no period; a stream of consciousness style of writing. I felt the approach was deliberate to show an instability in Ike's life. As if we were him talking through all of his emotions in coming to the decision to give up the land that was part of his inheritance...There were times, however, in this chapter, where it got a little muddy for me. I could feel the sense of urgency as the boy states his alarm at the way the land has been taken from the Native Americans and the history of slavery...when he says:

I'm trying to explain to the head of my family something which I have got to do which I don't quite understand myself, not in justification of it but to explain it if I can. I could say I don't know why I must do it but that I do know I have got to because I have got myself to live with for the rest of my life and all I want is peace to do it in.

You see that he is trying hard to understand things that he does not understand.

The last chapter, he returns to the hunting grounds before a logging company comes through and destroys the land. He can hear the trains come closer and sees firsthand as industry quickly swallows up the forest.

Faulkner was definitely ahead of his time...this story was first published in the 1930s. The story, itself, takes place in the late 1800s. The themes here about the effects of industrialization and expansion on our shrinking wilderness is something that was not as hot a topic in the 1930s. It is an impressive story that is as appropriate today as it was then.

Next story is Walt Whitman's Leaves of Grass. Perfect for the summer. Just wish we would have weather that resembles it soon!

The List

Almost done with The Bear...very good, Chapter 4 was a little hard to follow, but good. More to come on that later. I thought before I go too much further, I would list the Top 50:

	Book Title	Author	In Posession?
1	The Way We Live Now	Trollope, Anthony	x
2	The Looming Tower	Wright, Lawrence
3	Prisoners of the State	Ziyang, Zhao
4	The Big Switch	Carr, Nicholas
5	The Bear	Faulkner, William	x
6	Winchell	Gabler, Neal
7	Random Family	LeBlanc, Adrian Nicole
8	Night Draws Near	Shadid, Anthony
9	Predictably Irrational	Ariely, Dan
10	God: The Biography	Miles, Jack	x
11	The Unsettling of America	Berry, Wendell
12	A Good Man is Hard to Find	O'Connor, Flannery
13	Underground	Murakami, Haruki
14	Disrupting Class	Christensen, Clayton
15	Air Guitar	Hickley, Dave
16	Leaves of Grass	Whitman, Walt	x
17	The Trouble with Physics	Smolin, Lee
18	City: Rediscovering The Center	Whyte, William
19	Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?	Dick, Phillip
20	Benjamin Franklin	Morgan, Edmund	x
21	The Mississippi Books	Twain, Mark
22	Among the Thugs	Buford, Bill
23	Brooklyn	Toibin, Colm
24	Frankenstein	Shelley, Mary	x
25	Bad Mother	Waldman, Ayelet
26	Guests of the Ayatollah	Bowden, Mark
27	Whittaker Chambers	Tanenhaus, Sam
28	Midnight's Children	Rushdie, Salaman
29	American Prometheus	Bird, Kai and Sherwin, Martin
30	The Lost	Medelsohn, Daniel
31	Gilead	Robinson, Marilynne	x
32	Pictures at a Revolution	Harris, Mark
33	Kim	Kipling, Rudyard	x
34	Walking with the Wind	Lewis, John
35	The Line of Beauty	Hollinghurst, Alan	x
36	The Dark is Rising	Cooper, Susan
37	Persepolis	Satrapi, Marjane	x
38	Underworld	DeLillo, Don
39	Why Evolution is True	Coyne, Jerry
40	American Pastoral	Roth, Phillip	x
41	The Botany of Desire	Pollan, Michael
42	The Regeneraton Trilogy	Barker, Pat
43	Senator Joe McCarthy	Rovere, Richard
44	Year of Wonders	Brooks, Geraldine	x
45	The Elegance of the Hedgehog	Barberry, Muriel
46	Gone Tomorrow	Child, Lee
47	Things Fall Apart	Achebe, Chinua
48	American Journeys	Watson, Don
49	Cotton Comes to Harlem	Himes, Chester
50	The New Biographical Dictionary of Film	Thompson, David

16 pages to go on The Bear...

So, here we go...

Well hello there. If you happened upon this blog, congratulations. Simply put: this blog is meant for me to document my personal challenge to read through all 50 books that Newsweek recommends we read now: http://www.newsweek.com/id/204300. It truly is a diary that I can look back on or share with my children when they get older. However, if people join and start talking about the books, I would love it. Call it a virtual book-club.

A few things about me:

1. While I am always reading, I would not call myself a voracious reader. Sure, my whole day is spent reading emails, marketing materials, blogs, newspapers, magazines, and "tweets" for my job, when I sit down to read a book, I am unfortunately so tired, I end up reading a page and I am out.
2. I keep busy...I have two wonderful young children under the age of 5. My wife is going to nursing school so that means that the bulk of the parental duties are on my shoulders. Not complaining at all, just between work and kids, the free time is not really there.
3. Which is BS...Like most Americans, I finish dinner, put the kids down and then I plop down in front of the TV and zone out for a few hours. Why not devote more time to reading? So, instead of turning on the TV right away, I am trying to get a habit to get in at least an hour of reading every night. I hope that time grows even more. Really, I don't need TV. Cooking shows are fun, a couple comedies are cool too...but after realizing I was not going to get through the last 5 "24" episodes because, well, I don't really care if Jack saves the world again, I made the effort to read more.
4. Which is part of why I am embracing this article in Newsweek. At the same time I said "enough is enough", this issue came in the mail and I said, "ok, Newsweek, it's ON!"
5. The Iran election also is a motivation for this, as well. In the aftermath of the results, I was following a couple sources on Twitter to see what was happening overseas. My heart was with all the protesters and while I understood what was happening on the surface of all the demonstrations, I really didn't quite understand the background to it. I was 8 years old at the time of the Islamic Revolution and saw Iran as many Americans did - They hate America and want to destroy us. The "tweets" and reports from the Daily Show's Jason Jones showed a much different picture. These were people who wanted to be liked in the world, they wanted to be free...I read up on articles in Salon.com, Newsweek, New York Times, pretty much anything that gave some background on how we ended up at this point in history. While I have a basic understanding now, I realized that is a very complex picture there. I was excited to see that there are several books about Iran (including the graphic novel, Persepolis) on the list. I hope these books help me gain understanding of what is going on there.
6. I majored in Psychology and Sociology in school. While I was required to take literature classes, I do not call myself a literary critic. And really, that isn't the point. I will give my thoughts and plot summary to the books, but hopefully I will talk more about why this book is pertinent now. Literature is, I feel, completely subjective. Each person who reads a story will get something different from it. Case in point: in college, we read Hemingway's short story, "Hills Like White Elephants." Our professor was going over symbolism in the story and said that the suitcase that was left behind signified an abortion...Em, wha? Not what I got from the story at all. So, no discussion of symbolism, if you want that, take a class.

Ok, so there is the background. Now the rules:

1. I will not read the books in order, but once I start a book, my intention is to finish it.
2. I don't have a set time frame. It would be great to say that I am giving myself a year to do it, but 50 books is basically a book a week. Could be done, but I am not going to kill myself trying.
3. The intention is to post once I finish a book...I may put posts during reading when I came across something important, or that I find interesting.

So, yesterday, I went to a local used bookstore and started looking for the books on the list. Got 10 of them for about $45. I ended up getting an 11th at Barnes and Noble. Now, the first book:


No. 5 on the list...William Faulkner's, "The Bear". Newsweek calls it: "A boy comes of age in the 1880s by learning the ways of the fast-disappearing Mississippi forests. The best environmental novel ever written." You can get it on Amazon. Now, I have 47 pages left in the book I am reading now (The Mad Ones, if you must know)...should be able to finish that today and then it will be onto The Bear. See you soon.